Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolutely Anything

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to Terry Jones#Collaborations. Discussion on alternative targets should likely take place at Talk:Terry Jones. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 19:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely Anything (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per point 5 at WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, but no prejudice against recreation at the appropriate time. WP:NOTNEWSPAPER until confirmation at least that it is all funded and actually in production and has a planned release date (however tentative). Barney the barney barney (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• delete' WP:NFF. I tried to prod it already but it was declined by the creator. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suspected he would, hence the pre-emptive AfD. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 00:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/Redirect A section in Monty Python is a plausible redirect with a citation or two (e.g. http://movies.broadwayworld.com/article/MONTY-PYTHON-Troupe-to-Reunite-For-Upcoming-Film-ABSOLUTELY-ANYTHING-20120126 ) and then re-create it as an article when it's appropriate. I don't see why deletion is necessary but I suppose it's an option. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I just boldly changed it to a {{R with possibilities}} to Terry_Jones#Collaborations, where BBC and Variety refs document the possibility. 67.100.127.249 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Calling the Question. If there are no objections to the redirect, I'll go ahead and close this in a bit. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.