Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Sayem (Cyber Criminal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 22:52, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Sayem (Cyber Criminal)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined A7. Lesser-known internet criminal. Sources only mention the subject in passing, and they do not seem to support individual notability. Fails WP:NCRIMINAL. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Internet, and Bangladesh. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i think we should remove this article. Deshi Aura (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This seems to be the only coverage about this person [1] and it's hardly enough to show criminal notability. Not meeting notability requirements, the lack of sourcing isn't helping. Oaktree b (talk) 02:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ewww. Bearian (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: it's hardly enough to show criminal notability. Not meeting notability requirements, the lack of sourcing isn't helping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deshi Aura (talk • contribs) 05:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per User:CycloneYoris Variety312 (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Not notable, violates WP:BLPCRIME, and author has requested deletion above. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:BLPCRIME advises not to write articles about people accused of a crime before they have been convicted. Also, WP:CRIMINAL suggests people notable in connection with one crime should not be covered with a biography, but if the crime is notable then that event should be covered instead. I would note that this person is only one of nine accused for the same crime, and Wikipedia doesn't seem to have articles about any of the other accused. This seems inconsistent to me. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.