Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace Money Transfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. This has already been speedy deleted as ACE Money Transfer. SarahSV ^(talk) 22:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ace Money Transfer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ace Money Transfer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 11:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Purely promo article with nothing to suggest notability (WP or real life); fails WP:NCORP. Article by the same name has been previously created (by the same editor with possible COI) and deleted a couple of times, from what I can tell. Therefore should probably be salted as well for good measure. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Despite heroic efforts on the part of the creator, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP in that it lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Also, it is WP:ARTSPAM. While it does not meet my threshold for deleting under WP:G11, I would not object if it were speedily deleted. I have not checked prior iterations to see if WP:G4 applies. Analysis of sources extant in article: Transferwise, routine promotionally toned coverage lacking depth; Ace Money Transfer, subject's website; Androidbank, comparison with another product, but not in sufficient depth; Checkout, routine, promotionally toned coverage lacking depth; My News Desk, press release. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Previous iteration speedily deleted by me. WP:G4 does not apply. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noting similarly titled ACE Money Transfer was WP:A7'd and SALTed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.