Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aces High @ 23 Wall Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aces High @ 23 Wall Street

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PROD contested by article author. Nominating due to notability according to the general notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (books). Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article author is also the author of this self-published book. I can't find independent evidence that it has even been published - it is not listed on Amazon (though CreateSpace is one of Amazon's self-publishing subsidiaries) or on Google Books, and the ISBN cited does not check out. In any case, falls far short of the standard of WP:Notability (books). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FAME ze GREAT about his other book. With the increasing number of self-published authors trying to promote their books here, I wonder if we need a new speedy-deletion criterion analogous to WP:CSD#A9. JohnCD (talk) 10:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Have been unable to find independent reviews or coverage. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG as I have tried to find reliables sources but it was unsuccesfull, plus it fails WP: NBOOK. Electric Catfish 21:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This absolutely fails notability guidelines for books. I was unable to find anything that would show that this book is notable. I actually wasn't able to find anything that wasn't a primary source.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since these are the only sources for this book, I have to agree that it fails WP:NBOOK sadly. --Artene50 (talk) 04:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable self published book Nick-D (talk) 23:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.