- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Across Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. The article does not establish any notability. Jsharpminor (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: another B2B company (indistinguishable from the rest of them) with no notable products and PR noise instead of significant mention in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:NOT, WP:NCORP and even WP:GNG. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow Talk 15:50, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Dmitrij. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.