Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActiveModeler Avantage
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ActiveModeler Avantage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a non-notable piece of software, no claims of notability are made. The article was created by someone who appears to have a strong COI. The references may well make no mention of this specific software. I removed the two that I could check. I can't find any mentions on google which suggest notability either. Smartse (talk) 13:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- At first sight, I doubt you are right about notability. There is a German and Turkish article on this subject. The Germans are normally pretty secure about these kind of things. I notioced the German article also related to a German community, see here. But I will look into this some more. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- At second sight, I can't seem to find any reliable sources. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 13:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I checked the German copy too - it was created after this one was and seems to be a carbon copy of it. The community is also inactive by the looks of it - not that that really matters. Smartse (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, I guess you are right. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 14:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I checked the German copy too - it was created after this one was and seems to be a carbon copy of it. The community is also inactive by the looks of it - not that that really matters. Smartse (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fits the profile of a typical spammer - non-notable, non-consumer "business process" software. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 14:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.