Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActiveWAFL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 06:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ActiveWAFL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this framework is notable. Also interwikis are not true. (just the Persian one (فارسی) was not broken that was linked to another PHP framework, CakePHP) –ebraminio^talk 22:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Googling turned up nothing useful but did turn up an "Examples" page that's all "Coming soon". When the release number is zero-point-something and even the "Hello world" example isn't soup yet, this is looking pretty much WP:MADEUP. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: another web framework, no significant coverage. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unable to establish notability. --Kvng (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. For that matter, even unreliable sources seem few and far between. -- Whpq (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.