Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active Citizens Transform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-19 06:30Z

Active Citizens Transform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Lack of notability Mmoyer 02:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No assertion of notability.--Bryson^{{Talk}{Edits}} 03:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per references added. --Bryson^{{Talk}{Edits}} 23:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• weak delete, appears the only notability is to have some research they paid for published [1]. - Ctbolt 06:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, notability is A notable topic has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works that are reliable and independent of the subject. All that the references add is one coverage of their launch and one coverage of their research. This is not notable. The most that this article deserves is one sentence in United Kingdom general election, 2005. - Ctbolt 01:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find evidence of notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No refs; per nom.

Keep References have been added, so I'm changing my vote to keep. -- P.B. Pilhet 22:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no sources at all, fails notability. V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions · ER 3} 21:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • As sources, and a little bit of notability in those sources, have been found, I will change to keep. V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions · ER 3} 22:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain 21:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. I listed this for Afd, and having read the references, it appears this organization was a very brief "flash in the pan". Mmoyer 00:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.