- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ad Astra Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no third party reliable sources to confirm the notability of this company; fails WP:CORP. An IPThe author removed my PROD. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:CORP. I was going to nominate this one for deletion myself. Claritas § 10:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Produced 1 film in 2008 and distributed 5 since 2007. Not very productive. Not much in distribution. Lack of coverage of this company fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.