Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete; editorial decision taken to redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 16:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This page is nothing but a description of a site on the web and an external link. The site does not appear to meet the criteria in WP:WEB, and users would be better served if there were simply a link to the site from the Ada Prgramming language article, rather than a link to our own summary of the site. This is my first time suggesting an article for deletion, so I would appreciate it if senior Wikipedians would take the time vote, even if this request seems uncontroversial. Joebolte 05:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This website may be prominent enough to serve as a source for the Ada programming language article, but it doesn't warrant its own page. Bobby1011 06:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Pepsidrinka 18:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Ada programming language if it isn't already there. Haikupoet 02:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Smerge with Ada programming language and delete. -- Krash (Talk) 14:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I already see a link to this site in Ada programming language (the .org and .com domains appear to be the same web site). Should this article still be redirected to Ada programming language, or can it be deleted? --Deathphoenix ʕ 05:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• If the info's already there, just Redirect Fan1967 05:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Agree with Deathphoenix. -- Alpha269 15:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 22:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.