Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adagio for Strings in popular culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as more popcult listcruft. Daniel Case 13:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adagio for Strings in popular culture

Delete - see for precedent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1812 Overture in popular culture. This is a directory of loosely associated items. These things have nothing in common with each other beyond happening to include some portion of a particular piece of music. The inclusion of this music tells us nothing about the piece, the works in which it's included, their relationship to each other or the real world. In answer to the inevitable suggestion, I strongly oppose merging any of this information into Adagio for Strings or any other article. It's a laundry list/trivia dump in its own article and no more worthwhile cluttering any other article. Otto4711 13:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete oh god, another "in popular culture" list! the day they all go will be a happy day. Totnesmartin 13:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment so WHY should it be deleted? WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason. Lugnuts 14:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article couldn't even be a section of Adagio for Strings per WP:TRIVIA, which is part of WP:FIVE.-- aBSuRDiST -^T J ^C- 15:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure trivia - violation of WP:FIVE Corpx 17:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Trivia does not belong on Wikipedia. Sawblade05 17:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:TRIVIA, merge the sourced ones in the parent article.--JForget 23:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of these sets of scrappy un-filtered notes can ever become a encyclopedia article. Golfcam 17:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.