- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Mandsford 19:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Adam Bader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Of its four refs, two contain nothing of any pertinence, one is subject's blog, another of questionable notability. Doddy Wuid (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG, as well as WP:CREATIVE. GiantSnowman 18:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 01:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.