- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Adams Approach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Seems more like an advert to me. Unless this technique can be said to be scientific and accepted (even moderate prevelance in the musician community will do) no reason to keep it. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 14:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, almost an advert. GizzaDiscuss © 08:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.