Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adaora Angela Ayoade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adaora Angela Ayoade

Adaora Angela Ayoade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources that establish her notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I can find no significant coverage either. The sources in the article do not establish notability, and the article itself reads like a cross between a resume and a press release. -- Whpq (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. This is not a place where every single person who exists as a professional anything automatically gets to have an article just because they exist — notability on here takes the form of a specific achievement that satisfies one or more of our inclusion rules, and is supported by reliable source coverage. This prosified résumé does neither. Delete with fire. Bearcat (talk) 07:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not at all notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 01:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Also seems to be WP:RESUME. --Jersey92 (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.