- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge and Redirect to Ecological niche. Agent 86 19:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a definition, and although it has been proposed to be merged, nothing has happened for the last month. This should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Diez2 20:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge (and redirect) to Ecological niche (per proposal). This is a scientific concept that is present in many palaeontology and evolutionary sciences texts. However, it is to stubbish to remain in its current form. If the section grows, it can be moved back to a standalone article. Caknuck 21:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Xyrael / 10:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect Ecological niche. Not worthy of its own article in its current state. Demiurge 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Best to be bold and merge this kind of stuff, without worrying with an AfD, when it's just a stub.--ElaragirlTalk|Count 18:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.