Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addictinggames.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Robert T | @ | C 02:18, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rambling promotion of marginally noteworthy website. Delete. —HorsePunchKid→龜 04:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable. tregoweth 05:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, i know the site, but the article is obviously unencyclopedic. if someone thinks the site is notable (it has an alexa rank of 1324), they could re-create the article later. --ColdFeet 06:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Isn't that why we have {{stub}} and {{cleanup}}? - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 19:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, definately unencyclopedic. Quote from the article: "I like the site and highly reccomend it to anyone who like games." - Akamad 07:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:WEB. I've removed the earnest entreaty to sign up and the promotion of the author's favourite game. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 15:02, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a perfect example of a subject that should receive an article, but this isn't an article. I'd be happy to keep it if expanded, so feel free to prove me wrong and let me know once it's expanded. As it stands now it shouldn't be kept. - Mgm|(talk) 15:46, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep, establishes notability. Kappa 02:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Substub#Differences_between_a_stub_and_a_substub. I believe substubs are not helpful and should be deleted. If one cannot write a decent stub on a subject, filing a request instead is the way to go. - Mgm|(talk) 14:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe any article which adequately defines a topic and establishes notability if necessary is valuable, and certainly not worth going through an AFD process to remove. This article gives users the valuable information that addictinggames is a popular games website and not just a random one someone set up yesterday. Kappa 14:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Substub#Differences_between_a_stub_and_a_substub. I believe substubs are not helpful and should be deleted. If one cannot write a decent stub on a subject, filing a request instead is the way to go. - Mgm|(talk) 14:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Bad metawiki stub article on site with no original content. -- Grev -- Talk 04:18, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Dottore So 14:58, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. *drew 14:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.