Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Additor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw^talk 06:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additor

Additor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Move to WP:Additor? Maybe. It says "wiki-based". 333-blue 06:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Too short and just a definition of a tool used (kind of). Jackninja5 (talk) 06:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete by all means, nearly even speedy material. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 21:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.