- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JodyB talk 17:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AddonFox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found zero sources with significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 22:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is indeed no significant coverage, and this browser extension isn't notable in any way, shape, or form. KaySL talk 23:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE - Not notable in any way. Autumnalmonk (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge to Firefox main article. Heiro 03:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.