Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeptia BPM Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate wasCopyvio, All Deleted under CSD A8. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 03:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also similar articles at Adeptia Inc, Adeptia Integration Server, Adeptia XML Mapper. All were tagged for speedy, but don't seem to qualify, though they should be deleted as spam. R. fiend 13:16, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - sorry, I'm not quite familiar with the AfD process yet so I tagged these as speedy hoping that someone would know the right thing to do :) *goes and reads up on deletion process* Keithlard 13:54, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Copyvio from [1] I'd put that on the articles but don't want to complicate the Afd further. Dlyons493 Talk 20:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gentlemen, please keep in mind that we now have CSD A8, which is speedy for copyvios. All of these articles are copyvios and could have been tagged as such. Please don't hesitate to add a copyvio and speedy tag for articles that are in violation, it's much easier and faster than full AfD. Even if something is already on AfD, we can get rid of it that much faster if you go ahead and speedy it. Thanks for the vigilance, keep up the good work. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 03:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.