Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Pratap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Pratap

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NLAWYER. The article doesn't describe any accomplishments beyond being a lawyer in various court cases, and all available coverage appears to be either trivial mentions, quotes, or articles written by the subject. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, I have tried to improve the article. Please do review and consider. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DSN18 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DSN18: I don't see any new sources added, just some copyediting, so as far as this deletion discussion is concerned, nothing has changed. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosguill Sir, As suggested by you i have added more new references to improve the article. Please do review and consider. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DSN18 (talk • contribs) 06:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The additional sources don't have in depth coverage either. I would be swayed if you could find coverage that provides actual analysis of Pratap, as opposed to just quoting him in the context of a case. Also, please stop calling me sir, it's extremely weird (unless you call your coworkers "sir", in which case you do you). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing notability here. A lawyer, pretty much like any other. Two of his cases were covered in the news, but that's not unusual. If there were very important cases, that might be an argument for articles on the cases, but 1) they aren't particularly notable, and 2) even if they were, the lawyer would not be notable by contagion. TJRC (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TJRC. Couldn't find any sources indicating the possibility of notability on a cursory search. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.