Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admin's Syndrome
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE, WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin's Syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable neologism; Wikipedia ain't for things that were made up yesterday. (declined PROD) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources, nothing on GScolar. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:32, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Perhaps not made up yesterday, but fairly recently; in any case non-notable (yet). הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 20:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable neologism. §FreeRangeFrog 23:15, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not the Urban Dictionary. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree, not a neologism, but the term seems fairly new. I could not find any references other than blogs. I could find no journal article or books, so this term has not yet entered mainstream medicine or psychiatry. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but as it stands, the term/topic lacks reliable references and fails notability. Mark viking (talk) 23:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.