- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 10:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adobe Type (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks neutrality, rarely gets edited, adds very little information to Wikipedia beyond the pages it already links to, and has been a stub for a very long time with very little substance to build off of to improve it. Supertanno (talk) 07:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.