Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adopen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Please file a separate AfD for ADO Group. → Call me Hahc21 04:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adopen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We have two pages here - Adopen and ADO Group - which appear to be twins seperated at birth. Both are overly bloated ads, both are poorly written, and now both are at afd due to the latter being csd'd. I'm asking the community two things: 1) should the articles be axed for unambigious advertising, and if not 2) which one gets merged and redirected. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Both IMO, they should both get the axe, but thats me. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: Admins, I've never handled a double nomination before, so I left Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADO Group blank, if this was in error, please fix it. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Adopen. Ado Group needs to be discussed separately. It may or may not be notable, but there is more reason to ekep it as the parent company. Abdelsalam Al Hassani

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.