- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 14:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Adrien leduc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-published author with no indications of notability. Profile in the alumni magazine of his alma mater doesn't really count as "independent coverage". Reviews at amazon.com or smashwords don't count as "reliable". WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I find no reliable sources discussing this author or his work. Indeed, the two-sentence plot summary in the alumni magazine is not useful at all. --Kinu t/c 17:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not yet notable per WP:AUTHOR, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Darth Sitges (talk) 11:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Quoting Amazon customer reviews is a sign of no other reliable sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.