- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Adsdoc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references and no claim of notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - Absolutely nothing to indicate that this software package passes the general notability guideline. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not seeing any reliable 3rd party coverage here. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another document management software package. Hardly even evidence of existence, let alone notability. Tiny, uninformative stub. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.