Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adsfat and Gradrap

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Hearing no objections, and the author saying below they no longer need them, and at least one of them being an nn-bio, these are gone. -Splash^talk 01:12, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

'Adsfat and Gradrap' zero googles - and confessed to 'using Wikipedia'. Flathump Desert - no googles. 'Bros. Czap' no googles and states 'using' wikipedia as a medium. As far as I can tell this is some sort of vanity trying to get notability through WP, but I could be wrong. --Doc (?) 09:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't Delete I am the author. I apologize. These are for a class project due today. Can I please make a request that these stay up for at least 5 hours? After that they can be deleted. Lancewilshire | talk

Apology accepted - they will stay up for a while (indeed 5 days if nothing is done). You can't actually delete these, you can only blank them and it isn't helpful if you do that. When you are finished, please post a message here requesting deletion, and they should be speedily deleted by an admin. --Doc (?) 13:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If this is for a class project, are there other vanity pages from other class members that we need to start looking for? BlankVerse ∅ 15:22, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • I wish my class projects had included creating articles on Wikipedia. But then, when I was still in school (other than university), the WWW was still quite unknown in my country. — JIP | Talk 16:21, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete them all. Vanity - UtherSRG (talk)
• Delete the lot of them, self-admitted vanity. — JIP | Talk 12:03, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agreed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per above arguments. Thue | talk 13:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vanity CLW 13:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, vanity. Ral315 16:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does anyone mind if I speedy the lot now they've had their 5 hours of glory? -Splash^talk 18:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Nope, but perhaps leave a note on talk. If they have any more use for them, they should be userfied --Doc (?) 18:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.