Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Data & Network Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Data & Network Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:ORG. Lack of significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject, prod was declined by IP author. Ray^Talk 20:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No significant external coverage in notable sources. No proof of notability. LK (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Appears to be thinly veiled as spam. Says the company does computer consulting. Just rings like an advertisement. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. I would have just deleted it myself and closed this, were the delete tool working properly; and I likely will when it is fixed. At any rate, this is obvious advertising that also shows a catastrophic failure to show minimal importance: Two college graduates from the University Of North Carolina Asheville (UNCA), after doing some independent part-time consulting, decided to start their own local Information Technology company. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I took this under advisement. Change to Speedy Delete G11. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of reliable sources. There are no articles about this company on Google News Archive. I read the article and have failed to see any promotional content. Perhaps the admin reviewing the {{db-spam}} can close this AfD as a regular delete (since this AfD has been listed for 9 days) instead of speedy delete as spam. Cunard (talk) 23:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.