Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Energy Research Organization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 21:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Energy Research Organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable company. Makes no claim of notability and sounds like an advertisement for said company. G-hits seem to be mostly advertisement blurbs and bios for people who work there. Redfarmer (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I obtained a copy of the previously deleted version of this article. Perhaps someone other than myself will take the time to combine the two. __meco (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being a research organization, a Wikipedia article would hardly be self-serving. The notable with AERO is that it is the latest development of the work of Dr. Steven Greer and has a unique strategy how to get environmentally friendly technologies out to benefit the masses. People having done their homework pertaining alternatives to energy generation will know this, and I believe it is an important subject to be up to date on. If your (moderators) minds change about this entry, I will make it a complete article meeting Wikipedia standards. Livinggoldtree (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 06:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete first, this article does not cite any independent, reliable sources to support any claim to notability it may have, or to allow any of the basic facts to be verified. The only sources are to the AERO site which is hardly independent of the subject of this article. Turning to the site itself, it is a pseudoscience conspiracy site of the worst sort. It claims that "secret government black operations" teams have secret anti-gravity and perpetual motion machines. "Dr Greer" is offering a "prize" for anyone who can develop a perpetual motion machine or anti-gravity machine. Its a scam and the only reason for this article is to promote this (at best) badly misguided person. Wikipedia should absolutely not be allowing itself to be used to lend a false air of legitimacy to such nonsense. Gwernol 10:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable both as a company, and (as pointed out above) as a crank group. Lankiveil (talk) 11:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Gavin Collins (talk) 11:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.