Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Traffic Management
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splashtalk 23:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwikied to Wiktionary Scrappy36 01:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There's no difference between this article and a stub. The stub saves people the trouble of having to visit Wictionary and from the danger of not finding out about it at all. Primetime 07:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. According to Wikipedia:Stub, "A stub is an article that's obviously too short, but not so short as to be useless. In general, it must be long enough to at least define the article's title, which generally means 3 to 10 short sentences." This article does not satisfy that guideline. Who uses such a term? Who uses the acronym? Until there's some more information, delete. --Fang Aili 18:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. The technology is patently real and worth an article. This isn't it. Yet. Jcuk 21:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Redirect to Wikitionary article ComputerJoe 21:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.