Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advances in stegonography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-01 07:13Z

Advances in stegonography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is obviously a copyright violation of a paper published elsewhere, or it's original research. Even if it's not original research not under copyright, it's basically the full text of a scientific paper and inappropriate for WP. Prod contested by the author without explanation. eaolson 19:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I highly doubt this paper was even published elsewhere. It reads like a freshman CompSci paper. --Haemo 00:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is unreasonable & unfair to conclude that something is a copyvio, when there is no evidence for what it might be a violation of. As Haemo said, in this case it isn't good enough to be that, but it's not encyclopedic either. We have a fairly good article on Steganography DGG 00:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.