Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advertising operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising operations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability as a distinct article. Wikipedia has extensive articles on advertising and marketing. The author who created this has three edits to his credit: creating the page, creating the talk page for his article, and making one other minor edit to this article. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 16:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Does this denote anything distinct from marketing, advertising, etc? Recruitment is an industry full of buzzwords, but we don't need to have an article on all of them. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article itself even says that the expression has no clear meaning. Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article implies that the term is in broad use but I found no evidence of that, or even (as noted above) consensus as to its meaning. Dictionary definition issues would apply if there was consensus; as it is, it just doesn't seem to be notabile. Ubelowme (talk) 20:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.