Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advice to Tor users in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was incorrect nomination; this is not an article, use WP:MFD for pages in the Wikipedia: namespace. (Liberatore, 2006). 12:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All this article does is tell people in China how to break a law. Regardless of whether or not that is bias against the law or not doesn't matter. Wikipedia should not have an article directed at a specific group of people telling them how they can break the law to edit wikipedia. This is an advice page for illegal activity. Bsd987 23:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Wikipedia's servers are not in China and therefore not subject to Chinese law. --Nelson Ricardo 00:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying this is illegal. I am saying that wikipedia should not have a page that explicitly fosters illegal activity. Bsd987 03:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Should we have pages about File Sharing? Yes. Wikipedia is only bound by Florida, US Federal and (if it ever came to it) International Law. Batmanand | Talk 08:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Doesn't meet any of the criteria in Wikipedia:Deletion_policy additionally see WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored If we start censoring based on legal juristictions other than the one we have to (Florida) then we'll wind up having to censor based on ALL juristictions, that'd wipe out half of wiki I expect. Astaroth5 09:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.