Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeon Center for Cosmology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani ^talk 00:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aeon Center for Cosmology

Spam? Vanity? No third party sources? Something from all. Please delete, 2nd choice merge to Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet. --Pjacobi 20:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to assert notability. if genuine sources were added which asserted notability, then it should be merged with main article. scope_creep

There are plenty of Organizations, Schools Centers, Ashrams and such that are included on Wikipedia. Aeon Center for Cosmology is of no less significance than any of those. A good comparison pages is Ridhwan School (the School of an author, A.H. Almaas) ... Aeon Center is the school of author Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet. Why is including it here it considered spam? If things need to be changed to make it more suitable, fine, request that, but the Center exists and is a significant school of cosmology.

Delete per nom, appears to be part of a walled garden of Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet-related esoteric cruft. Sandstein 06:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to assert notability. --A. B. 06:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG DELETE This article is one of a series of unsupported articles on non-notable subjects all in an apparent attempt to boost the credibility of one non-notable author. See the following:

Before today I don't think I have ever used the term "CRUFT" before in an AfD discussion, but now I must say: CRUFT! CRUFT! CRUFT! Sandstein's term is apt-- "a walled garden of cruft." What a tremendous amount of work for mere vanity articles that have no place in Wikipedia!!OfficeGirl 17:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My feelings exactly (although with somewhat fewer exclamation marks). Once the present AfDs are over, I'll draw up a mass AfD for the rest of this cruft-fest. Sandstein 18:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about all the exclamation marks. I guess I was taken aback by the extent of the articles created in this scheme. I went ahead and made a mass AfD for the rest of these here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet(2nd nomination) before I read your note. It is listed as a 2nd nomination because there was also a Category created for this author and someone tried to use the AfD process to delete the category. OfficeGirl 19:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for taking the trouble, and don't worry about the !s... they are a sadly unappreciated character on Wikipedia. :-) Sandstein 20:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It has 32 google hits, no good. Rex the first ^{talk | contribs} 23:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.