Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerican Empire (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Ethically ^(Yours) 16:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aerican Empire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable nation/micronation. This is a self-aggrandizing article about an insignificant topic. Sources ≠ notability. ArticleForDeletion (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)— User:ArticleForDeletion (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep I have herd of aerican empire and there are enough independent sources to prove notability.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Should I delsort this under fictional elements? Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 14:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and report the nominator to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention for violation of a username policy. Epicgenius (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.