- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sensation. LFaraone 23:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aesthesia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See page history Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 20:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Shouldn't this go to WP:RFD? Grandmartin11 (talk) 22:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a redirect in it's current state. Does it really even matter that much? Aren't the procedures the same? Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 00:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Sensation as it did originally. I agree this is the wrong forum, but also it shouldn't have been blanked. In this case, reverting to the uncontroversial redirect is the best immediate action; it could then be taken to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion if there is more debate. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Sense or Sensation (psychology), as Aesthesia means "ability to feel or perceive sensations". I was responsible for the page blanking by the way — sorry about that, I wasn't aware of the policy for redirect deletion and assumed that blanking a redirect was equivalent to requesting a speedy deletion. After reading through the redirect policy I now feel this page should point to its antonym, sense. --Xiaphias (talk) 01:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as suggested, per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 17:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Sensation (psychology) as per the above. Sensation is off the table because it is a disambiguation page - far better, generally, to redirect to a specific target. We have one, in this case. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.