Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affordaspendability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 09:32Z

Affordaspendability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Affordaspenability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (redirect)

Delete Clear WP:NEO. No independent ghits. Orderinchaos78 14:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unsourced neologism, original research. Walton monarchist89 14:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFT. 0 Ghits. Ohconfucius 06:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFT]. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO SatuSuro 14:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.