- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Jonathan Bertman. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- AfraidToAsk.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (web). Created by User:Infomed, an WP:SPA who also created Jonathan Bertman, with possible WP:COI issues. Rd232 talk 02:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 05:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 05:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Jonathan Bertman. Not notable. The article exaggerates the importance of the subect in the Supreme Court case (in which it was merely one of many plaintiffs), and there is no other source of notability. --MelanieN (talk) 16:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per MelanieN. Logical Cowboy (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.