- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- AfterSys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:WEB and/or WP:CORP. <100 Google hits, for one. Biruitorul
- Delete. No claim to notability, no third party references. Also, appears to violate WP:COI. Bongomatic (talk) 06:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Talk 03:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MrNerdHair (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can't see any Google hits which indicate coverage in secondary sources. It is incidently a candidate for speedy deletion under criterion A7. Jll (talk) 12:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. A tech services business (web hosting company) that fits the typical profile of a Wikipedia spammer. Absolutely no showing of importance made in the article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.