Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afterburner (modification kit)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (X! · talk)  · @234  ·  04:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afterburner (modification kit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unreferenced and questionable notability; PROD was removed without any effort being made to add sources. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This product has been covered by Newsweek, Electronic Gaming Monthly (no longer available online), IGN, Computimes, and is mentioned by ZDNet. Additionally, it has been reviewed/covered by dozens of gaming specific sources that may or may not pass as reliable sources: see (http://www.google.com/search?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=afterburner+triton+labs&btnmeta%3Dsearch%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web). This story indicates that at least 75K units were sold. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per ThaddeusB: significant Reliable Source coverage is apparent from brief Google test. -Thibbs (talk) 17:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.