This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 01:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism; there are two WP articles about "Robert Levin," although neither is the one who is credited with coining this word; 86 unique Google hits. Paul 06:51, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:07, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting this, the original entry didn't draw enough discussion to establish a consensus. Rx StrangeLove 15:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This philosophy is under attack and suffering oppression in web forums due to the implied anti-capitalist and anti-intellectual property stance. Please do not delete the entry without strong concensus to do so. Edit by user:24.218.145.239, users second edit. Rx StrangeLove 18:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless this term is used by people other than the guy who coined it. Friday (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. I can't find any uses other than in Wikipedia mirrors or by the guy who created it. --Carnildo 23:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found this site, that is currently down [1], but a google scholar search turns up zero links [2]. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 23:06, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.