- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agar (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Software with no assertion of notability (or notability generally) that I can find. Declined prod, with no reason given. Ironholds (talk) 08:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As non-consumer software, this set of C++ graphical libraries is unlikely to receive general interest outside the field of C++ graphical programming. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Though I strongly oppose the previous delete comment. Wikipedia is not a trivia site, the subject of an article should not be evaluated on general interests. Carewolf (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per lack of nontrivial coverage from independent sources. - Eldereft (cont.) 15:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.