Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Postal Locator System
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Air Postal Locator System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find any references for this at all. Therefore no evidence of notability, but does not fit into any of the CSD, strictly construed. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 14:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No references available with which to establish notability. - MrX 15:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This was created today give it some time to let people add to itPug6666 19:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think giving it more time will make it more notable. Also see WP:PLEASEDONT. - MrX 20:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This went to AfD a whole 67 minutes after it was created with zero evidence that WP:BEFORE was followed or even that a much simpler prod tag was attempted. - Dravecky (talk) 21:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry for not specifying precisely that I carried out the steps listed at WP:BEFORE, but I did, and could not find any sources whatsoever, as I mentioned in my rationale, and the only link to it outside the AfD process was added to another article by the creator because it shared the initials APLS.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This went to AfD a whole 67 minutes after it was created with zero evidence that WP:BEFORE was followed or even that a much simpler prod tag was attempted. - Dravecky (talk) 21:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think giving it more time will make it more notable. Also see WP:PLEASEDONT. - MrX 20:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 17:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsourced, and as far as I can tell, is unsourceable. Despite the definition given in the article, I really don't know what it is. Is it a sorting system? Is it a package tracking system? It severely lacks context. -- Whpq (talk) 14:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.