- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was move. This was already Boldly accomplished. Joyous! | Talk 21:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this page does just seem rather pointless...I mean, Aircraft Part. Clearly it'd be best to just have the actual parts, not some vague page such as this. Change1211 02:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've expanded this page significantly. --DV8 2XL 04:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 12:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Weak keep - a move might help, but the article is still in serious need of fixes in terms of content, POV, and uncited statements. Reads more like a press release from the industry's leading companies than a neutral article about the industry itself. Kafziel 16:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Move to Aircraft parts industry. That's really the crux of it, at this point. Nice job by DV8 2XL. PJM 14:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move per PJM above. The article is worthwhile and explains why it's necessary to use certified parts, but the name doesn't really reflect that. --Elkman 15:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move - as above. Wickethewok 16:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Aircraft parts industry —Mets501talk 16:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Moveed per WP:BOLD. ---J.S (t|c) 20:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.