Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay H Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please assume good faith with my decision. If you believe this article was deleted without good reason, please request undeletion at deletion request, not my talk page. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay H Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find support for notability for "Ajay H Singh" or "Ajay Harinath Singh", or for "Ajay Singh" in conjunction with "Darwin Platform". I removed the article's one reference, to the Darwin home page, which is almost entirely "lorem ipsum". There's even very little coverage for "darwin pgc" or "darwin platform". —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. May be a hoax. I took the liberty of removing {{featured list}} from the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is a rewrite of the deleted article Ajay Harinath Singh, which was speedy-deleted as unambiguous promotion per WP:CSD#G11. This new version appears to be a more neutral re-write. The references cited in the deleted version were http://www.darwinpgc.com, http://www.darwinprealty.com, http://www.darwinpmassmedia.com/, http://www.darwininfra.net, and http://www.darwinplogistics.com - none of which would be acceptable to establish notability. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability not established. Jevansen (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - What a load of name dropping. But none of it can be substantiated with sources.-- Whpq (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.