Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Kumar Doval

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-09 09:24Z

Ajit Kumar Doval (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fixing abandoned AfD. I give no opinion. CastAStone|^(talk) 15:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  11:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. He easily meets WP:BIO from newspaper coverage. I've added links to a couple of sources and taken off 3 of the tags. It still needs more cleaning up. Mereda 12:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• STRONG DELETION.He doesn't meet Wiki criteria of notability. This way Wikepedia shall be reduced to indexing of each and every human being if we don't delete this page.Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia of notable individuals and not a referencing/cataloguing of individuals. Benjamin us 13:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User's first edit. The user also prodded Rahul Gandhi[1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Utcursch (talk • contribs) 08:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

• Keep - Mereda seems to have established notability.Bakaman 00:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Googling for Ajit Doval and Ajit Kumar Doval indicates notability. References are available, and should be added. utcursch | talk 08:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.