Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Panicker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ajit Panicker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ajit Panicker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. An example of WP:CITEKILL with most of the sources being primary or unreliable. Hitro talk 05:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 05:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG; WP:NAUTHOR. Goodreads; Facebook; Createspace as sources? Good grief. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: WP:TOOSOON, too many self published sources, fails WP:GNG QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 01:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR, I looked in-depth wasn't able to find notability per WP guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 06:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Profile should be kept due to this profile is about renowned writer from Lucknow, India and keeps notability Aksdw (talk) 07:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The sources are not, well, great. YouTube is used as a source too many times. It is generally not acceptable to use YouTube as a source. The sources that aren't YouTube also are not the best. I don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater (see WP:BATHWATER) but I think deletion will encourage another user to create an article on him and do it even better. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 21:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.