- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Improvement in page sufficient, and discussion indicates keep closure. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 03:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Akal Security (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP Vanadus (talk | contribs) 02:22, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I've updated the article to include the coverage it has received in national and regional newspapers.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This company is very large, very unusual and very interesting. Coverage in the New York Times also shows that it is notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Your "New York Times" coverage is a link to the Wikipedia article about the New York Times, formatted as an external link. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The New York Times article referred to appears to be this one: Sikh Group Finds Calling in Homeland Security. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, and keep. In depth coverage at NPR and NYT. Reasonably neutral text. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it is a notable company so i think keep. Tony (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.