Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhandanand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akhandanand

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Akhandanand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have searched about this and the reference to this article only appears in product name etc and some kind of advertising platform. It is already tagged for non notability. Hence, it gives me a belief that it fails WP:GNGHeba Aisha (talk) 03:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha (talk) 03:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If he dies in 1987, it would be indeed difficult to find online sources. I tried searching him on Google Books to see if something has been documented but nothing. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not enough sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Current sources fails in passing WP:GNG. Pilean (talk) 16:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.