Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Abbas charitable foundation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Al Abbas charitable foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AI generated spam that that is little more than an advertisement masquerading as an article. Article focus bounces back and forth from "Al Abbas" and his multiple companies/foundations/etc. Copy and paste moved to mainspace. However, let's just cut right to notability and not bother sending this back to draft space:
- Non-notable lawyer who fails the GNG or ANYBIO.
All the sources are routine news coverage about things the subject may have truly been involved in, but there is no in-depth significant coverage that warrants a standalone article. Nominating delete, no time in the draftspace will salvage an article where the subject is not notable. Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Business. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Bobby Cohn I already started a discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al abbas charitable foundation. Whats weird is that it seems that there are two articles on the same subject, just with different capitalization. Gaismagorm (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Gaismagorm: Of course there are, that doesn't surprise me given the article history. Procedurally this has become quite a mess, one article could be BLAR'ed to the other and we can consolidate AfDs. If someone uninvolved wants to close this one, I'll copy and paste my argument over there. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, for what it's worth, the articles aren't identical. This one seems to be more focused on the (now indeffed) author/namesake of the organization while the other does tend to focus more on the foundation itself. Bobby Cohn (talk) 22:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh dang. I didn't really read over the other version, not gonna lie, I was just assuming it was the same since the title was the same and it would kind of fit. Gaismagorm (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Not saying a merge of the two AfDs would be improper (I don't know, has that been done before?) but that they are slightly different. Bobby Cohn (talk) 12:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh dang. I didn't really read over the other version, not gonna lie, I was just assuming it was the same since the title was the same and it would kind of fit. Gaismagorm (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, for what it's worth, the articles aren't identical. This one seems to be more focused on the (now indeffed) author/namesake of the organization while the other does tend to focus more on the foundation itself. Bobby Cohn (talk) 22:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Gaismagorm: Of course there are, that doesn't surprise me given the article history. Procedurally this has become quite a mess, one article could be BLAR'ed to the other and we can consolidate AfDs. If someone uninvolved wants to close this one, I'll copy and paste my argument over there. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete see my vote @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al abbas charitable foundation. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: See vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al abbas charitable foundation. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per !vote at the duplicate AfD entry. Madeleine (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.