Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albrecht Matrix Hybrid
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Albrecht Matrix Hybrid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely non-notable, seemingly created by the person who invented it, so essentially WP:MADEUP. SmartSE (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete zero sources in artcile. Zero sources found online news sources. Only source found is the web page of the organization. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:COI; fails WP:OR; fails WP:V; fails WP:SELFPUBLISH; do I need to keep looking?--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, completely non-notable, seemingly created by the person who invented it. Many people have created their own systems for predicting win, loss and have a bet on this or that horse or team. All of them fail, just like this one; it fails because there are no references. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete' Nonnotable rating system. Fails GNG. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 21:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.